Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*()

2010-11-25 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 01:03 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: Hi all, There were some murmurings on IRC last week about renaming the of_*() routines. ... The thinking is that on many platforms that use the of_() routines OpenFirmware is not involved at all, this is true even on many powerpc

Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*()

2010-11-25 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 14:34, Michael Ellerman mich...@ellerman.id.au wrote: I've left for_each_child_of_node(), because I read it as of, but maybe it's OF? I always read it as for each child-OF-node, so I would rename it to dt_for_each_child_node. Gr{oetje,eeting}s,                        

Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*()

2010-11-25 Thread Grant Likely
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Michael Ellerman mich...@ellerman.id.au wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 01:03 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: Hi all, There were some murmurings on IRC last week about renaming the of_*() routines. ... The thinking is that on many platforms that use the of_()

Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*()

2010-11-25 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 15:01 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: I always read it as for each child-OF-node, so I would rename it to dt_for_each_child_node. Well, it was meant to be for_child_of_node not _OF_node :-) Cheers, Ben. ___ Linuxppc-dev

Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*()

2010-11-25 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 09:17 -0700, Grant Likely wrote: On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Michael Ellerman mich...@ellerman.id.au wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 01:03 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: Hi all, There were some murmurings on IRC last week about renaming the of_*() routines.

Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*()

2010-11-25 Thread Mitch Bradley
On 11/25/2010 5:15 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 09:17 -0700, Grant Likely wrote: On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Michael Ellerman mich...@ellerman.id.au wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 01:03 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: Hi all, There were some murmurings on IRC last

Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*()

2010-11-25 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 18:42 -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote: On 11/25/2010 5:15 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 09:17 -0700, Grant Likely wrote: On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Michael Ellerman mich...@ellerman.id.au wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 01:03 +1100, Michael

Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*()

2010-11-25 Thread Grant Likely
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Michael Ellerman mich...@ellerman.id.au wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 18:42 -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote: On 11/25/2010 5:15 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 09:17 -0700, Grant Likely wrote: On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Michael Ellerman

Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*()

2010-11-25 Thread Mitch Bradley
One Laptop Per Child ships real Open Firmware on its x86 Linux systems, of which approximately 2 million have been shipped or ordered. An ARM version, also with OFW, is in the works. OK. I don't see any code under arch/x86 or arch/arm that uses of_() routines though? Or is it under drivers