[PATCH 3/3 RFC] dt: add documentation of ARM dt boot interface

Signed-off-by: Grant Likely --- For RFC only. I do not plan to merge this change yet. g. Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-of.txt | 40 +++ 1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-of.txt b/Documenta

[PATCH 2/3] dt: Remove obsolete description of powerpc boot interface

32 and 64 bit powerpc support has been merged for a while now, but the booting-without-of.txt document still describes 32 bit as not supporting multiplatform, which is no longer true. This patch fixes the documentation. Also remove references to powerpc-specific details outside of section I in pr

[PATCH 1/3] dt: Move device tree documentation out of powerpc directory

The device tree is used by more than just PowerPC. Make the documentation directory available to all. v2: reorganized files while moving to create arch and driver specific directories. Signed-off-by: Grant Likely --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/fsl-sata.txt |0 Documentation

[PATCH 0/3] dt: documentation reorganization

This series reorganizes and cleans up the device tree documentation to make the directory useful for non-powerpc users. Patch 3 of this series adds some documentation about the ARM device tree boot interface, but I'm posting this one for RFC only at the moment. I'll not merge this until dt suppor

linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree

Hi all, After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this: arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S: Assembler messages: arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S:989: Error: attempt to move .org backwards arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S:999: Error: attemp

Re: State of suspend-to-ram?

On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 12:03 +0100, Mathias Krause wrote: > Hi all! > > First of all: Sorry, this is the wrong mailing list, but I searched a > lot and found none that would fit to PPC user-related problems -- > linux-ppc would have been one but this one seems to be dead since > 2004? .../ T

State of suspend-to-ram?

Hi all! First of all: Sorry, this is the wrong mailing list, but I searched a lot and found none that would fit to PPC user-related problems -- linux-ppc would have been one but this one seems to be dead since 2004?! I've a G4 based Mac mini and would like to suspend it to RAM, though the vani

Re: PCIe end-point on FPGA doesn't show up on PCI bus when configured

Stijn Devriendt wrote: > As far as I know, you're violating PCIe spec. > PCIe base spec (rev1.0a) states that a device must start link training > within 80ms > after a fundamental reset and that each device must be ready to accept config > requests within 100ms after fundamental reset. Nope. From