Jiri Olsa [jo...@redhat.com] wrote:
| >
| > Can we remove the assumption that the event id is a generic event that
| > has PERF_COUNT_HW_ prefix and also let the architectures pass in a "show"
| > function ? This would allow architectures to display any arch specific
| > events that don't yet have
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:20:45AM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> Jiri Olsa [jo...@redhat.com] wrote:
> | On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 11:19:28AM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> |
> | SNIP
> |
> | > +struct perf_pmu_events_attr {
> | > + struct device_attribute attr;
> | > + u64 id;
> | > +};
Ping
At 11/01/2012 05:44 PM, Wen Congyang Wrote:
> The patch-set was divided from following thread's patch-set.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/5/201
>
> The last version of this patchset:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/23/213
>
> If you want to know the reason, please read following thr
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:29:04PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual
That's not a sufficient description of why you are making this
change. In particular, what is the motivation for and impact of using
LONG_ASM_CONST?
Paul.
__
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 21 -
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
index 9710be3..e3f10bb 100644
-
On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 13:42 +0530, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
> IFC_FIR_OP_CMD0 issues command for execution without checking flash
> readiness. It may cause problem if flash is not ready. Instead use
> IFC_FIR_OP_CW0 which Wait for tWB time and poll R/B to return high or
> time-out, before issuing
