On Tue, 2014-23-09 at 03:53:54 UTC, Mahesh Salgaonkar wrote:
> From: Mahesh Salgaonkar
>
> The flush_tlb hook in cpu_spec was introduced as a generic function hook
> to invalidate TLBs. But the current implementation of flush_tlb hook
> takes IS (invalidation selector) as an argument which is arc
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 08:27:22AM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> > Have you tested this with (upcoming) GCC 5.0? GCC now uses CR5,
> > and it likes to use it very much, it might be more convenient to
> > use e.g. CR1 (which is allocated almost last, only before CR0).
> >
> No. I did not try
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 12:58:55PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Have you tested this with (upcoming) GCC 5.0? GCC now uses CR5,
> > and it likes to use it very much, it might be more convenient to
> > use e.g. CR1 (which is allocated almost last, only before CR0).
>
> We use CR1 all o
On 2014-11-28 13:52, Michal Marek wrote:
> make ARCH=powerpc help- should not require a cofigured
> source tree. Also, sort the boards in the output.
I added this to kbuild.git#kbuild.
Michal
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
make ARCH=powerpc help- should not require a cofigured
source tree. Also, sort the boards in the output.
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek
---
Sorry for the double post to the ppc mailing list. The first version got
rejected by the vger spam filter.
---
Makefile | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(
make ARCH=powerpc help- should not require a cofigured
source tree. Also, sort the boards in the output.
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek
---
Makefile | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 88b7fa5..0cd4e14 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefil
Add the device tree binding document for the DPAA corenet node
and DPAA Ethernet nodes.
Signed-off-by: Madalin Bucur
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-dpaa.txt | 31 ++
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 08:45 +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> > > Can't we just unconditionally clear at as long as we do that after we've
> > > saved it ? In that case, it's just a matter for the fixup code to check
> > > the saved version rather than the actual CR
From: Madhavan Srinivasan
> On Thursday 27 November 2014 07:35 PM, David Laight wrote:
> > From: Madhavan Srinivasan
> >> This patchset create the infrastructure to handle the CR based
> >> local_* atomic operations. Local atomic operations are fast
> >> and highly reentrant per CPU counters. Used
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 12:49:08 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 10:28 +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 10:39:23 +1100
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2014-11-17 at 18:42 +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > > The first argument to vphn_unpack
On Thursday 27 November 2014 07:35 PM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Madhavan Srinivasan
>> This patchset create the infrastructure to handle the CR based
>> local_* atomic operations. Local atomic operations are fast
>> and highly reentrant per CPU counters. Used for percpu
>> variable updates. Loc
11 matches
Mail list logo