smp_ops->probe() is currently supposed to return the number of cpus in
the system.
The last actual usage of the value was removed in May 2007 in e147ec8f1808
"[POWERPC] Simplify smp_space_timers". We still passed the value around
until June 2010 when even that was finally removed in c1aa687d499a
"
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 14:20 +1100, Sam Bobroff wrote:
> @@ -145,6 +146,24 @@ END_FW_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(FW_FEATURE_SPLPAR)
> andi. r11,r10,_TIF_SYSCALL_DOTRACE
> bne syscall_dotrace
> .Lsyscall_dotrace_cont:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
> +BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
> + b
One last question before I spin out v9.. the dma_mask code
is a bit confusing to me, so I want to make sure... the code is
> if (limit + tbl->it_offset > mask) {
> limit = mask - tbl->it_offset + 1;
> /* If we're constrained on address range, first try
>
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> [+cc Sam (commented on previous versions), Russell, linux-arm-kernel, Ralf,
>> linux-mips, Ben, linuxppc-dev, x86]
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 02:32:34PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>>
On Sat, 2015-04-04 at 07:27 -0400, Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
> One last question before I spin out v9.. the dma_mask code
> is a bit confusing to me, so I want to make sure... the code is
>
> > if (limit + tbl->it_offset > mask) {
> > limit = mask - tbl->it_offset + 1;
> >
These structs can be const, so make them const.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches
---
Done with:
sed -r -i -e 's/\bstruct\s+uart_ops\s+(\w+)\s*=\s*/const struct uart_ops \1 =
/g' drivers/tty/serial/*.c
Compiled x86 only, not cross-compiled. Untested.
drivers/tty/serial/21285.c | 2
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> [+cc Sam (commented on previous versions), Russell, linux-arm-kernel, Ralf,
>>> linux-mips, Ben, linuxppc-dev, x86]
>>>
>>> On Fri
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> I think there's still an unresolved question about the OF parsing code.
>
> Got a pointer to what that is? I'll take a guess. Generally, we make
> the parsing code independent of the kern
