[PATCH 09/31] Add powerpc-specific parity functions

2016-03-26 Thread zhaoxiu.zeng
From: Zeng Zhaoxiu Signed-off-by: Zeng Zhaoxiu --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h index 59abc62..90ee0f2 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h +++ b/arch

[PATCH 1/1] perf tools: Fix build break on powerpc

2016-03-26 Thread Sukadev Bhattiprolu
From 502e8236082412db1d33abfad95aaf14b539502e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 17:31:39 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] perf tools: Fix build break on powerpc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 'Commit 531d

Re: [RFC] powerpc/mm: Support bootmem for PPC64 again

2016-03-26 Thread Gavin Shan
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 08:23:54PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: >On Fri, 2016-25-03 at 16:03:41 UTC, Gavin Shan wrote: >> CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM is enabled on PPC platforms by default. However, >> user might disable that to have bootmem for other purpose. So it's >> resonable to support it. > >Hi Gavi

Re: [RFC] mm: Fix memory corruption caused by deferred page initialization

2016-03-26 Thread Gavin Shan
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 08:47:17PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: >Hi Gavin, > >On Fri, 2016-25-03 at 16:05:29 UTC, Gavin Shan wrote: >> During deferred page initialization, the pages are moved from memblock >> or bootmem to buddy allocator without checking they were reserved. Those >> reserved pag

Re: [RFC] mm: Fix memory corruption caused by deferred page initialization

2016-03-26 Thread Michael Ellerman
Hi Gavin, On Fri, 2016-25-03 at 16:05:29 UTC, Gavin Shan wrote: > During deferred page initialization, the pages are moved from memblock > or bootmem to buddy allocator without checking they were reserved. Those > reserved pages can be reallocated to somebody else by buddy/slab allocator. > It lea

Re: [RFC] powerpc/mm: Support bootmem for PPC64 again

2016-03-26 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Fri, 2016-25-03 at 16:03:41 UTC, Gavin Shan wrote: > CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM is enabled on PPC platforms by default. However, > user might disable that to have bootmem for other purpose. So it's > resonable to support it. Hi Gavin, Sorry but I don't understand. We deliberately removed bootmem suppor

Re: [PATCH RFC] powerpc/mm: Support bootmem for PPC64 again

2016-03-26 Thread Balbir Singh
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Gavin Shan wrote: > CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM is enabled on PPC platforms by default. However, > user might disable that to have bootmem for other purpose. So it's > resonable to support it. > The changelog could use some rewriting. What other purpose would bootmem would

Re: [PATCH HACK 1/6] livepatch-test: Add more cases

2016-03-26 Thread Balbir Singh
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > * Michael Ellerman [2016-03-24 22:04:00]: > >> Not for merging. >> > > Hi Michael, > > Loading the livepatch sample module, trigger following warning > The #if IS_MODULE(CONFIG_SCSI) code is buggy, you probably have CONFIG_SCSI=y, make i