> If the function "platform_get_irq()" failed, the negative value
> returned will not be detected here, including "-EPROBE_DEFER",
I suggest to adjust this change description.
Wording alternative:
The negative return value (which could eventually be “-EPROBE_DEFER”)
will not be detected here
Hi Markus
On 2020/4/10 15:33, Markus Elfring wrote:
If the function "platform_get_irq()" failed, the negative value
returned will not be detected here, including "-EPROBE_DEFER",
I suggest to adjust this change description.
Wording alternative:
The negative return value (which could eventua
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 12:57 AM Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2020-04-09 at 11:41 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Now if these boxes didn't ever have agp then I think we can get away
> > with deleting this, since we've already deleted the legacy radeon
> > driver. And that one used vm
> Hardware experiments show that the negative return value is not just
> "-EPROBE_DEFER".
How much will this specific error code influence our understanding
of the discussed software situation?
>>> + ret = udc_controller->irq ? : -ENODEV;
>> Will it be clearer to specify values for all c
Hi Markus:
On 2020/4/10 16:30, Markus Elfring wrote:
Hardware experiments show that the negative return value is not just
"-EPROBE_DEFER".
How much will this specific error code influence our understanding
of the discussed software situation?
From my superficial knowledge, I think we should n
Hello!
On 10.04.2020 4:58, Tang Bin wrote:
If the function "platform_get_irq()" failed, the negative value
returned will not be detected here, including "-EPROBE_DEFER", which
causes the application to fail to get the correct error message.
Thus it must be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Tang Bin
Signe
On 10.04.2020 4:58, Tang Bin wrote:
If the function "platform_get_irq()" failed, the negative value
returned will not be detected here, including "-EPROBE_DEFER", which
causes the application to fail to get the correct error message.
Thus it must be fixed.
platform_get_irq() prints an appro
On 2/10/20 7:49 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Sandipan Das writes:
Independent builds of the vm selftests is currently broken
because commit 7549b3364201 overrides the value of ARCH with
the machine name from uname. This does not always match the
architecture names used for tasks like header inst
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 03:32:17PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> The latest Xilinx design tools called ISE and EDK has been released in
> October 2013. New tool doesn't support any PPC405/PPC440 new designs.
> These platforms are no longer supported and tested.
>
> PowerPC 405/440 port is orphan fr
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 11:38:16AM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h
> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h
> index 2eb6c234d594..81606223494f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h
> @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ extern
> On Apr 9, 2020, at 10:14 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 06:06:35 -0400
> Qian Cai wrote:
>
I’ll go to bisect some more but it is going to take a while.
$ git log --oneline 4c205c84e249..8e99cf91b99b
8e99cf91b99b tracing: Do not allocate buffer in trac
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 11:38:17AM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> Now that architectures provide arch_hugetlb_valid_size(), parsing
> of "hugepagesz=" can be done in architecture independent code.
> Create a single routine to handle hugepagesz= parsing and remove
> all arch specific routines. We can
Leonardo Bras writes:
> Implement rtas_call_reentrant() for reentrant rtas-calls:
> "ibm,int-on", "ibm,int-off",ibm,get-xive" and "ibm,set-xive".
>
> On LoPAPR Version 1.1 (March 24, 2016), from 7.3.10.1 to 7.3.10.4,
> items 2 and 3 say:
>
> 2 - For the PowerPC External Interrupt option: The * ca
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 11:38:18AM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
[...]
> @@ -3255,7 +3254,6 @@ void __init hugetlb_add_hstate(unsigned int order)
> unsigned long i;
>
> if (size_to_hstate(PAGE_SIZE << order)) {
> - pr_warn("hugepagesz= specified twice, ignoring\n");
>
To prevent verifying the kernel module appended signature twice
(finit_module), once by the module_sig_check() and again by IMA, powerpc
IMA secure boot rules define an IMA architecture specific policy rule
only if CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is not enabled. This, unfortunately, does
not take into acco
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 11:38:19AM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> With all hugetlb page processing done in a single file clean up code.
> - Make code match desired semantics
> - Update documentation with semantics
> - Make all warnings and errors messages start with 'HugeTLB:'.
> - Consistently nam
Hello,
The issue still exists after the new PowerPC updates 5.7-2.
Please check the PowerPC updates 5.7-1.
Thanks,
Christian
On 08 April 2020 at 6:32 pm, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Hello,
Since the PowerPC updates 5.7-1 we have the following issue during the
linking of vmlinux:
MODPOST vml
Hi all,
Recently, our CI started running into several hangs when running the
spinlock torture tests during a boot with QEMU 3.1.0 on
powernv_defconfig and pseries_defconfig when compiled with Clang.
I initially bisected Linux and came down to commit 3282a3da25bd
("powerpc/64: Implement soft inter
Hi Sergey,
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:38:45AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (20/04/09 10:08), Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > Even though I don't know how many usecase we have using zsmalloc as
> > > > module(I heard only once by dumb reason), it could affect existing
> > > > users. Thus, pleas
From: Christoph Hellwig Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 4:59 AM
>
> The pgprot argument to __vmalloc is always PROT_KERNEL now, so remove
> it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
> ---
> arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c | 3 +--
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h| 3 +--
> arch
From: Christoph Hellwig Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 4:59 AM
>
> Use the designated helper for allocating executable kernel memory, and
> remove the now unused PAGE_KERNEL_RX define.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
> ---
> arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c| 2 +-
> arch/x86/include/
Nathan Chancellor's on April 11, 2020 6:59 am:
> Hi all,
>
> Recently, our CI started running into several hangs when running the
> spinlock torture tests during a boot with QEMU 3.1.0 on
> powernv_defconfig and pseries_defconfig when compiled with Clang.
>
> I initially bisected Linux and came d
Hi Nicholas,
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 10:29:45AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Nathan Chancellor's on April 11, 2020 6:59 am:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Recently, our CI started running into several hangs when running the
> > spinlock torture tests during a boot with QEMU 3.1.0 on
> > powernv_defconfig
Hi
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 7:50 AM Nicolin Chen wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 04:45:38PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
>
> > static int fsl_asrc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > struct fsl_asrc *asrc;
> > + struct fs
24 matches
Mail list logo
