Is PPC 44x PIKA Warp board still relevant?

Hi Michael, Nick, I was wondering if PIKA Warp board still relevant. The reason for my question is that I am interested in dropping legacy gpio APIs, especially OF-specific ones, in favor of newer gpiod APIs, and arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/warp.c is one of few users of it. The code in question is

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/irq: Modernise inline assembly in irq_soft_mask_{set,return}

On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 05:15:43PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 02:26:52AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > I still don't see what clauses guarantees asm("%0" ::"r"(foo)) to give > > 13. It doesn't say access via inline assembly is special, > > But it is. It is for

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/irq: Modernise inline assembly in irq_soft_mask_{set,return}

On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 02:00:55PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > On Sat Sep 24, 2022 at 8:15 AM AEST, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > Never it is guaranteed that all accesses through this variable will use > > the register directly: this fundamentally cannot work on all archs, and > > also not at -

Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/6] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature + dependencies

On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 09:16:50PM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 03:03:36PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > On Fri, 2022-09-23 at 19:10 +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > this is backport of commit 0d519cadf751 > > > ("arm64: kexec_file: use m

Re: [PATCH 0/7] powerpc/85xx: p2020: Create one unified machine description

Hello! Any comments for these patches? On Friday 19 August 2022 21:15:50 Pali Rohár wrote: > This patch series unifies all P2020 boards and machine descriptions into > one generic unified P2020 machine description. With this generic machine > description, kernel can boot on any P2020-based board w

Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: Add support for early debugging via Serial 16550 console

Hello! Is something else needed for this v2 patch? On Tuesday 23 August 2022 01:15:01 Pali Rohár wrote: > Currently powerpc early debugging contains lot of platform specific > options, but does not support standard UART / serial 16550 console. > > Later legacy_serial.c code supports registering U

Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/6] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature + dependencies

On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 12:13:34PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 11:45:21AM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 11:19:19AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 07:10:28PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > > > Hello, > > >

Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/6] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature + dependencies

On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 11:45:21AM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 11:19:19AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 07:10:28PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > this is backport of commit 0d519cadf751 > > > ("arm64: kexec_file: us

Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/6] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature + dependencies

On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 11:19:19AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 07:10:28PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > Hello, > > > > this is backport of commit 0d519cadf751 > > ("arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image > > signature") > > to table 5

Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/6] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature + dependencies

On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 07:10:28PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > Hello, > > this is backport of commit 0d519cadf751 > ("arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image > signature") > to table 5.15 tree including the preparatory patches. This feels to me like a new feature f