On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 1:13 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:41:40PM -0600, Alan Tull wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 12:58 AM Frank Rowand wrote:
> >
> > What LTSI's are these patches likely to end up in? Just to be clear,
> &g
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 12:58 AM Frank Rowand wrote:
What LTSI's are these patches likely to end up in? Just to be clear,
I'm not pushing for any specific answer, I just want to know what to
expect.
Thanks,
Alan
>
> On 11/8/18 10:56 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > Please pull the ch
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 2:57 PM Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 4:25 PM Alan Tull wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:48 PM wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Frank Rowand
> > >
> > > Add checks to (1) overlay apply process and
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:48 PM wrote:
>
> From: Frank Rowand
>
> Add checks to (1) overlay apply process and (2) memory freeing
> triggered by overlay release. The checks are intended to detect
> possible memory leaks and invalid overlays.
I've tested v5, nothing new to report.
Alan
>
> The
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 4:30 PM Alan Tull wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 9:39 PM wrote:
>
> Hi Frank,
>
> >
> > From: Frank Rowand
> >
> > Add checks:
> > - attempted kfree due to refcount reaching zero before overlay
> > is remove
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 9:39 PM wrote:
Hi Frank,
>
> From: Frank Rowand
>
> Add checks:
> - attempted kfree due to refcount reaching zero before overlay
> is removed
> - properties linked to an overlay node when the node is removed
> - node refcount > one during node removal in a chan
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:08 PM Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> On 10/16/18 02:47, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > frowand.l...@gmail.com writes:
> >
> >> From: Frank Rowand
> >>
> >> Add checks to (1) overlay apply process and (2) memory freeing
> >> triggered by overlay release. The checks are intended t
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 3:24 PM Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> On 10/15/18 12:21, Alan Tull wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 7:26 PM wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Frank Rowand
> >>
> >> Add checks to (1) overlay apply process and (2) memory freeing
&g
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 7:26 PM wrote:
>
> From: Frank Rowand
>
> Add checks to (1) overlay apply process and (2) memory freeing
> triggered by overlay release. The checks are intended to detect
> possible memory leaks and invalid overlays.
>
> The checks revealed bugs in existing code. Fixed t
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 7:26 PM wrote:
>
> From: Frank Rowand
>
> If overlay properties #address-cells or #size-cells are already in
> the live devicetree for any given node, then the values in the
> overlay must match the values in the live tree.
>
> If the properties are already in the live tre
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:39 AM Frank Rowand wrote:
[resend of my messed up rejected email of a minute ago, sorry]
>
> On 10/10/18 14:03, Frank Rowand wrote:
> > On 10/10/18 13:40, Alan Tull wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:49 AM Frank Rowand
> >> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:49 AM Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> On 10/09/18 23:04, frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Frank Rowand
> >
> >
> > "of: overlay: use prop add changeset entry for property in new nodes"
> > fixed a problem where an 'update property' changeset entry was
> > created for prop
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:14 PM wrote:
>
> From: Frank Rowand
>
Hi Frank,
> The changeset entry 'update property' was used for new properties in
> an overlay instead of 'add property'.
>
> The decision of whether to use 'update property' was based on whether
> the property already exists in the
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 7:02 PM Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> On 10/08/18 11:46, Alan Tull wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 10:57 AM Alan Tull wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:14 PM wrote:
> >>>
> >>> From: Frank Rowand
> >>
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 10:57 AM Alan Tull wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:14 PM wrote:
> >
> > From: Frank Rowand
> >
> > If overlay properties #address-cells or #size-cells are already in
> > the live devicetree for any given node, then the values in t
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:14 PM wrote:
>
> From: Frank Rowand
>
> If overlay properties #address-cells or #size-cells are already in
> the live devicetree for any given node, then the values in the
> overlay must match the values in the live tree.
Hi Frank,
I'm starting some FPGA testing on thi
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 10:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Alan Tull wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Frank Rowand
>> > wrote:
>> >> On 10/17/17 14:46
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 10/17/17 14:46, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>>> W
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
Hi Rob,
> With dependencies on a statically allocated full path name converted to
> use %pOF format specifier, we can store just the basename of node, and
> the unflattening of the FDT can be simplified.
>
> This commit will affect the remaini
19 matches
Mail list logo