Vitaly Wool writes:
Existing users, if any, should voice their objections. Otherwise, we can
remove z3fold in a few releases.
At this point I NACK this patch. We're about to submit an allocator
which is clearly better that z3fold and is faster that zsmalloc in
most cases and that submission
, should voice their objections. Otherwise, we can
remove z3fold in a few releases.
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed
Acked-by: Chris Down
Thanks. We are definitely hurting users as well by keeping this around with its
known issues when writeback is disabled, for example.
---
I have limited
