On Monday 23 April 2012 03:09:01 Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> 1. Working with task->mm w/o getting mm or grabing the task lock is
>dangerous as ->mm might disappear (exit_mm() assigns NULL under
>task_lock(), so tasklist lock is not enough).
that isn't a problem for this code as it specificall
On Thursday 01 March 2012 02:09:53 Anton Blanchard wrote:
> We want to implement a ppc64 specific version of atomic_inc_not_zero
> so wrap it in an ifdef to allow it to be overridden.
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messag
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Thursday 02 February 2012 11:36:59 Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Mike Frysinger [2012-02-02 11:28:46]:
> > On Thursday 02 February 2012 09:41:25 Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > > +#define profile_pc(regs) GET_IP(regs)
> >
> > pretty sure you don't need this as
On Thursday 02 February 2012 09:41:25 Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> +#define GET_FP(regs) (0)
> +#define SET_FP(regs, val)
ppc doesn't have a standard FP location ?
> +#define profile_pc(regs) GET_IP(regs)
pretty sure you don't need this as asm-generic/ptrace.h already has a
definition for
- mips: ar7 & ath79 & bcm47xx & bcm63xx & ip22 defconfig
- powerpc: mpc85xx & ppc64 defconfig
- sh: kfr2r09 defconfig
- sparc defconfig
- x86_64 defconfig
I don't have any toolchains for avr32, microblaze, openrisc, unicore32,
or xtensa. So they
d either.
I don't have any toolchains for avr32, microblaze, openrisc, unicore32,
or xtensa. So they lose :x.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
---
v2
- grub through arm gpio.h headers
- add m68k support
note: i've done a full build of all arm defconfigs, and any warnings
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 15:11, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 09:01:43AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h b/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
>> index d494001..622851c 100644
>> --- a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
>>
p; ip22 defconfig
- powerpc: mpc85xx & ppc64 defconfig
- sh: kfr2r09 defconfig
- sparc defconfig
- x86_64 defconfig
I don't have any toolchains for avr32, microblaze, openrisc, unicore32,
or xtensa. So they lose :x.
I don't see m68k supporting gpoil
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 06:17, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 11:09 +0100, David Howells wrote:
>> Can you inline this for the NOMMU case please?
>
> ---
> Subject: mm: Fix fixup_user_fault() for MMU=n
>
> In commit 2efaca927 ("mm/futex: fix futex writes on archs with SW
> tracking o
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 03:20, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hoping the BUG() isn't trippable by userspace but then it's no mmu, it's
> not like we care what userspace can do right :-)
side note ... common misconception that "no mmu" == "no memory
protection". a few of the nommu processors have
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 21:29, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> The futex code currently attempts to write to user memory within
> a pagefault disabled section, and if that fails, tries to fix it
> up using get_user_pages().
>
> This doesn't work on archs where the dirty and young bits are
> maintai
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:02, Kumar Gala wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/platform_device.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
missing header blob with explanation/copyright/license
> +/*
> + * an architecture can override to define arch_setup_pdev_archdata
> + */
> +#ifndef arch_setup_pdev_ar
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:29, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> arch/blackfin/configs/CM-BF548_defconfig | 2 +-
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 05:33, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> [...]
>> Do we need atomic_dec_not_zero() et.al. in every arch header - is there no
>> generic header which it could be added to?
>
> Mike Frysinger already tried to answer it in
> :
lready used in generic code.
>
> It's not obvious to me that sysrq-P actually does anything
> different with this option enabled, but I erred on the side of
> caution by keeping the most inclusive wording.
>
> Cc: uclinux-dist-de...@blackfin.uclinux.org
> arch/blackfin
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 04:05, David Laight wrote:
>> Introduce an *_dec_not_zero operation. Make this a special case of
>> *_add_unless because batman-adv uses atomic_dec_not_zero in different
>> places like re-broadcast queue or aggregation queue management. There
>> are other non-final patches w
atomic_t *v)
>c != (u); \
> })
> #define atomic_inc_not_zero(v) atomic_add_unless((v), 1, 0)
> +#define atomic_dec_not_zero(v) atomic_add_unless((v), -1, 0)
>
> /*
> * atomic_inc_and_test - increment and test
no opinion on the actual idea, but for t
It also is necessary for removing sysdevs from the kernel entirely in
> the future.
looks straight forward enough ...
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
> +static struct syscore_ops nmi_syscore_ops = {
> .resume = nmi_wdt_resume,
> .suspend = nmi_wdt_suspend,
>
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 14:39, RONETIX - Asen Dimov wrote:
> On 11/30/2010 09:25 PM, Daniel Walker wrote:
>> This driver adds a basic console that uses the arm JTAG
>> DCC to transfer data back and forth. It has support for
>> ARMv6 and ARMv7.
>>
>> This console is created under the HVC driver, and
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 06:07, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Also, while reading through all this, I noticed the blackfin SMP code
> looks to be broken, it simply discards any IPI when low on memory.
not really. see changelog of commit 73a400646b8e26615f3ef1a0a4bc0cd0d5bd284c.
-mike
___
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:17, Joe Perches wrote:
> drivers/ata/pata_bf54x.c | 2 +-
> drivers/video/bf54x-lq043fb.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/video/bfin-t350mcqb-fb.c | 2 +-
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
___
Lin
uot; SPI device IDs for M25Pxx flashes, so that the kernel
> still supports non-JEDEC flashes.
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
> [1]
> http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/project/uclinux-dist/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=5975
http://bl
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:47, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:34:05PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 07:20, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>> > You can't easily change OF. It's like "let's change ACPI tables
>> &
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 07:20, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> You can't easily change OF. It's like "let's change ACPI tables
> or BIOS in these PCs". Doable, but involves things like reflashing.
> And we usually have to support old BIOSes as well.
>
> OTOH, I see (git grep m25p arch/powerpc/boot/dts/) t
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:40, Christoph Egger wrote:
> 2 arch/blackfin/Kconfig:config MEM_MT48LC32M8A2_75
thanks, i'll get this simple bug fixed
-mike
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/lin
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 18:18, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> drivers/video/bf54x-lq043fb.c | 2 +-
> drivers/video/bfin-t350mcqb-fb.c | 2 +-
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxp
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 16:42, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 22:17 +0100, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
>> -static struct watchdog_info at32_wdt_info = {
>> +static const struct watchdog_info at32_wdt_info = {
>
> It'd be good to use a consistent structure name:
>
> static const struct watch
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 02:26, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> the Blackfin defconfigs refer to an input driver for the PCF8574, not
>> the I2C client driver
>
> Yup, I am aware of that. With the exception of:
>
> blackfin/configs/PNAV-10_defconfig:773:CONFIG_SENSORS_PCF8574=m
thanks for double checking.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 17:22, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> continuing the quest to clean up and ultimately remove the drivers/i2c/chips
> directory, this patch series removes three drivers for GPIO-expanders which
> are
> obsoleted and marked as deprecated for more than a year. The newer (and
> better)
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 13:05, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> This makes it consistent with other buses (platform, i2c, vio, ...).
> I'm not sure why we use the prefixes, but there must be a reason.
>
> This was easy enough to do it, and I did it.
acked-by-me for misc blackfin/adi drivers, thanks
-mike
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 20:47, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Mike Frysinger writes:
>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 03:10, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>> > +typedef struct {
>> > + long long counter;
>> > +} atomic64_t;
>>
>> lack of volatile seems odd compared
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 03:10, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> +typedef struct {
> + long long counter;
> +} atomic64_t;
lack of volatile seems odd compared to:
include/linux/types.h:
typedef struct {
volatile int counter;
} atomic_t;
-mike
___
Linuxpp
The remove function uses __devexit, so the .remove assignment needs
__devexit_p() to fix a build error with hotplug disabled.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
CC: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
---
v2
- include all hvc files
drivers/char/hvc_iseries.c |2 +-
drivers/char/hvc_vio.c |2
The remove function uses __devexit, so the .remove assignment needs
__devexit_p() to fix a build error with hotplug disabled.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
CC: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
CC: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/char/hvc_iseries.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 13:34, Grant Erickson wrote:
> This merges support for the previously DENX-only kernel feature of
> specifying an alternative, "external" buffer for kernel printk
> messages and their associated metadata. In addition, this ports
> architecture support for this feature from a
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 18:08, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> Can we eliminate the linuxppc-embedded mailing list and merge it with
> linuxppc-dev? I don't think we need two separate lists anymore and
> patches to linuxppc-embedded don't always get dealt with.
>
> Anyone hav
On Monday 16 July 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > Pretty much everyone uses "__attribute__" or "attribute", no one
> > uses "__attribute". This patch tweaks the three places in asm-powerpc
> > wher
Pretty much everyone uses "__attribute__" or "attribute", no one
uses "__attribute". This patch tweaks the three places in asm-powerpc where
this comes up. While only asm-powerpc/types.h is interesting (for userspace),
I did asm-powerpc/processor.h as well for con
40 matches
Mail list logo
