Error 1
>
>
> Reported-by: Sudip Mukherjee
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
And, this has fixed the build failure.
Thanks Michael.
--
Regards
Sudip
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 9:29 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 1:25 PM Sudip Mukherjee
> wrote:
> >
> > And the generated assembly still has the memset for "struct prom_args".
>
> Strange. That smells like a compiler bug to me.
Both gcc-12
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 3:44 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 2:13 AM Sudip Mukherjee
> wrote:
> >
> > I was trying to check it. With gcc-11 the assembly code generated is
> > not using memset, but using __memset.
> > But with gcc-12, I c
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 9:55 AM Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Not sure if it has been reported before but the latest mainline kernel
> branch fails to build for powerpc allmodconfig with gcc-12 and the error is:
>
> Error: External symbol 'memset&#x
Hi All,
Not sure if it has been reported before but the latest mainline kernel
branch fails to build for powerpc allmodconfig with gcc-12 and the error is:
Error: External symbol 'memset' referenced from prom_init.c
make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile:204:
arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init_ch
On Thursday 06 October 2016 11:06 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
The allmodconfig build of powerpc is failing with the error:
ERROR: ".irq_set_parent" [drivers/mfd/tps65217.ko] undefined!
export the symbol to fix the failure.
Hi Thomas,
powerpc and arm allmodconfig builds still fail
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:46:34PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> After merging the aio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/built-in.o: In function `aio_thread_op_foo_at':
> aio.c:(.text+0x4dab4): undefined reference to `__get_us
as pr_* macros are more preffered over printk, so printk replaced with
corresponding pr_* macros
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee
---
The replacement was done by a bash script to avoid copy paste error. The script
is as follows :
OLD="printk(KERN_ERR \?"
OLD1="printk(KERN_
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 07:41:23PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 08:32:58PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > as pr_* macros are more preffered over printk, so printk replaced with
> > corresponding pr_* macros
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherj
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 05:38:10PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:37:50 +0530,
> Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:43:03PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > At Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:02:04 +0530,
> > > Sudip Mukherjee wr
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:43:03PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:02:04 +0530,
> Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:57:04PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 19:21 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:57:04PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 19:21 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > as pr_* macros are more preffered over printk, so printk replaced
> > with corresponding pr_* macros.
>
> Are you simply running checkpatch on ever
ut of memory' message
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee
---
The replacement was done by a bash script to avoid copy paste error. The script
is as follows :
OLD1="printk(KERN_DEBUG \?"
OLD2="printk(KERN_ERR \?"
OLD3="printk(KERN_INFO \?"
OLD4="printk(KERN
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 08:32:58PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> as pr_* macros are more preffered over printk, so printk replaced with
> corresponding pr_* macros
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee
> ---
>
> The replacement was done by a bash script to avoid copy paste
as pr_* macros are more preffered over printk, so printk replaced with
corresponding pr_* macros
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee
---
The replacement was done by a bash script to avoid copy paste error. The script
is as follows :
OLD="printk(KERN_ERR \?"
OLD1="printk(KERN_
15 matches
Mail list logo
