On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:28:12AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> >> @@ -5773,6 +5771,59 @@ static int __init cgroup_memory(char *s)
> >> }
> >> __setup("cgroup.memory=", cgroup_memory);
> >>
> >> +static void memcg_node_offline(int node)
> >> +{
> >> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> >> +
> >> + i
line.
>
> Cc: Tejun Heo
> Cc: Andrew Morton
> Cc: Johannes Weiner
> Cc: Michal Hocko
> Cc: Vladimir Davydov
>
> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 68
> ++---
> 1 file changed, 60 in
gt; [ Take memcg_aware check outside for_each loop: Vldimir]
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Davydov
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 06:35:59PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> On 09/14/2015 05:34 PM, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 05:09:31PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> >>On 09/14/2015 02:30 PM, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 05:09:31PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> On 09/14/2015 02:30 PM, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:01:46AM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> >>The functions used in the patch are in slowpath, which gets called
> >>whenever a
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:01:46AM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> The functions used in the patch are in slowpath, which gets called
> whenever alloc_super is called during mounts.
>
> Though this should not make difference for the architectures with
> sequential numa node ids, for the power
