On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 04:08:30PM -0500, Jon Tollefson wrote:
> Jon Tollefson wrote:
> > David Gibson wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 12:12:27PM -0500, Jon Tollefson wrote:
[snip]
> > I have run through the tests twice now with this new patch using a 4k
> > base page size(and 16G huge p
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 05:19:27PM -0500, Jon Tollefson wrote:
> David Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 12:12:27PM -0500, Jon Tollefson wrote:
> >
> >> David Gibson wrote:
> >>
> >>> When BenH and I were looking at the new code for handling 16G pages,
> >>> we noticed a small bug.
Jon Tollefson wrote:
> David Gibson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 12:12:27PM -0500, Jon Tollefson wrote:
>>
>>
>>> David Gibson wrote:
>>>
>>>
When BenH and I were looking at the new code for handling 16G pages,
we noticed a small bug. It doesn't actually bre
David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 12:12:27PM -0500, Jon Tollefson wrote:
>
>> David Gibson wrote:
>>
>>> When BenH and I were looking at the new code for handling 16G pages,
>>> we noticed a small bug. It doesn't actually break anything user
>>> visible, but it's certainly not
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 17:16 -0500, Jon Tollefson wrote:
>
>> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>
Actually, Jon has been hitting an occasional pagetable lock related
problem. The last theory was that it might be some sort of race but it's
vaguely p
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 12:12:27PM -0500, Jon Tollefson wrote:
> David Gibson wrote:
> > When BenH and I were looking at the new code for handling 16G pages,
> > we noticed a small bug. It doesn't actually break anything user
> > visible, but it's certainly not the way things are supposed to be.
>
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 17:16 -0500, Jon Tollefson wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >> Actually, Jon has been hitting an occasional pagetable lock related
> >> problem. The last theory was that it might be some sort of race but it's
> >> vaguely possible that this is the issue. Jon?
> >>
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> Actually, Jon has been hitting an occasional pagetable lock related
>> problem. The last theory was that it might be some sort of race but it's
>> vaguely possible that this is the issue. Jon?
>>
>
> All hugetlbfs ops should be covered by the big PTL except wal
> Actually, Jon has been hitting an occasional pagetable lock related
> problem. The last theory was that it might be some sort of race but it's
> vaguely possible that this is the issue. Jon?
All hugetlbfs ops should be covered by the big PTL except walking... Can
we have more info about the pro
On 02.09.2008 [13:44:42 +0100], Mel Gorman wrote:
> On (02/09/08 15:05), David Gibson didst pronounce:
> > When BenH and I were looking at the new code for handling 16G pages,
> > we noticed a small bug. It doesn't actually break anything user
> > visible, but it's certainly not the way things are
On (02/09/08 15:05), David Gibson didst pronounce:
> When BenH and I were looking at the new code for handling 16G pages,
> we noticed a small bug. It doesn't actually break anything user
> visible, but it's certainly not the way things are supposed to be.
> The 16G patches didn't update the huge_
11 matches
Mail list logo
