On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 09:16 -0700, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote:
> legacy_serial identifies a valid ns16550 on a simple-bus, but the
> legacy_serial driver doesn't understand the shift and offset flags
> necessary to get it to work, which results in no console.
>
> I think the easiest solution is to
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 9:34 AM
> To: Stephen Neuendorffer
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; git
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Xilinx: add compatibility for
'simple-bus'.
>
> Stephen Neuendorffer wrote:
> > Grant Likely
8 9:34 AM
> To: Stephen Neuendorffer
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; git
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Xilinx: add compatibility for
'simple-bus'.
>
> Stephen Neuendorffer wrote:
> > Grant Likely wrote:
> > > > I th
Stephen Neuendorffer wrote:
> Grant Likely wrote:
> > > I think the easiest solution is to change the Kconfig so that
> > > PPC_UDBG_16550 is only selected based on !XILINX_VIRTEX. I've done this
> > > in my tree, but I've been swamped with other things at the moment, so I
> > > haven't verified i
9:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; git
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Xilinx: add compatibility for
'simple-bus'.
Is there really much of a chance of that, given the differences with the
bootwrappers?
Does anyone care enough
Likely
Sent: Sat 6/28/2008 1:33 PM
To: Stephen Neuendorffer
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; git
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Xilinx: add compatibility for 'simple-bus'.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Stephen Neuendorffer
<[EMAIL PROT
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Stephen Neuendorffer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> legacy_serial identifies a valid ns16550 on a simple-bus, but the
> legacy_serial driver doesn't understand the shift and offset flags
> necessary to get it to work, which results in no console.
>
> I think the eas
PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 11:25 AM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> >> Cc: Stephen Neuendorffer
> >> Subject: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Xilinx: add compatibility for
'simple-b
gt; Cc: Stephen Neuendorffer
>> Subject: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Xilinx: add compatibility for 'simple-bus'.
>>
>> ePAPR drafts propose 'simple-bus' as a generic compatibility type for
>> busses which cannot be probed for devices. In addition, the Xilinx
>&
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 11:25 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Cc: Stephen Neuendorffer
> Subject: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Xilinx: add compatibility for 'simple-bus'.
>
> ePAPR drafts propose 'simple-bus' a
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Stephen Neuendorffer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ePAPR drafts propose 'simple-bus' as a generic compatibility type for
> busses which cannot be probed for devices. In addition, the Xilinx
> versions of these IPs seem to be proliferating. Hence, in the future
>
ePAPR drafts propose 'simple-bus' as a generic compatibility type for
busses which cannot be probed for devices. In addition, the Xilinx
versions of these IPs seem to be proliferating. Hence, in the future
let's prefer to use the standard names. I've left the old names in
for short term backward
12 matches
Mail list logo
