Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] bootwrapper: Allow specifying of image physical offset

2008-03-10 Thread David Gibson
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:55:51AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: Normally we assume kernel images will be loaded at offset 0. However there are situations, like when the kernel itself is running at a non-zero physical address, that we don't want to load it at 0. Allow the wrapper to take an

Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] bootwrapper: Allow specifying of image physical offset

2008-03-10 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 10, 2008, at 7:37 PM, David Gibson wrote: On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:55:51AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: Normally we assume kernel images will be loaded at offset 0. However there are situations, like when the kernel itself is running at a non-zero physical address, that we don't want

Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] bootwrapper: Allow specifying of image physical offset

2008-03-08 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 7, 2008, at 7:44 PM, Geoff Levand wrote: On 03/07/2008 08:55 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: Normally we assume kernel images will be loaded at offset 0. However there are situations, like when the kernel itself is running at a non-zero physical address, that we don't want to load it at 0.

[PATCH] [POWERPC] bootwrapper: Allow specifying of image physical offset

2008-03-07 Thread Kumar Gala
Normally we assume kernel images will be loaded at offset 0. However there are situations, like when the kernel itself is running at a non-zero physical address, that we don't want to load it at 0. Allow the wrapper to take an offset. We use this when building u-boot images. Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] bootwrapper: Allow specifying of image physical offset

2008-03-07 Thread Geoff Levand
On 03/07/2008 08:55 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: Normally we assume kernel images will be loaded at offset 0. However there are situations, like when the kernel itself is running at a non-zero physical address, that we don't want to load it at 0. Allow the wrapper to take an offset. We use this