On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 00:15:23 +0200
Henrik Austad wrote:
> I don't really have an opinion to whether or not we /should/ have 00-INDEX,
> but the above 00-INDEX should either be removed or be kept up to date. If
> we should keep the files, I can try to keep them updated, but I rather not
> if we
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 11:39:42PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 09:58:04 -0600
> > Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> jon (who is increasingly inclined to apply this patch)
> >
> > As Colin Kaepernick
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 09:58:04 -0600
> Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> jon (who is increasingly inclined to apply this patch)
>
> As Colin Kaepernick now says... "Just do it!"
>
> ;-)
+1
But I'm biased, I'm part of the party that
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 09:58:04 -0600
Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> jon (who is increasingly inclined to apply this patch)
As Colin Kaepernick now says... "Just do it!"
;-)
-- Steve
On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 09:59:08 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 13:30:30 +0200
> Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > I'd say this is still quite valueable, and it might be worth fixing,
> > rather then removing completely.
>
> I agree. Perhaps we should have a 00-DESCRIPTION file in each
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 6:15 PM Henrik Austad wrote:
> This is a respin with a wider audience (all that get_maintainer returned)
> and I know this spams a *lot* of people. Not sure what would be the correct
> way, so my apologies for ruining your inbox.
>
> The 00-INDEX files are supposed to give
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 12:15:23AM +0200, Henrik Austad wrote:
> This is a respin with a wider audience (all that get_maintainer returned)
> and I know this spams a *lot* of people. Not sure what would be the correct
> way, so my apologies for ruining your inbox.
>
> The 00-INDEX files are
On 9/3/18 4:15 PM, Henrik Austad wrote:
> This is a respin with a wider audience (all that get_maintainer returned)
> and I know this spams a *lot* of people. Not sure what would be the correct
> way, so my apologies for ruining your inbox.
>
> The 00-INDEX files are supposed to give a summary of
On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 13:30:30 +0200
Pavel Machek wrote:
> I'd say this is still quite valueable, and it might be worth fixing,
> rather then removing completely.
I agree. Perhaps we should have a 00-DESCRIPTION file in each
directory, and each file could start with a:
DESCRIPTION:
and then
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 12:15:23AM +0200, Henrik Austad wrote:
> This is a respin with a wider audience (all that get_maintainer returned)
> and I know this spams a *lot* of people. Not sure what would be the correct
> way, so my apologies for ruining your inbox.
>
> The 00-INDEX files are
Hi!
> The 00-INDEX files are supposed to give a summary of all files present
> in a directory, but these files are horribly out of date and their
> usefulness is brought into question. Often a simple "ls" would reveal
> the same information as the filenames are generally quite descriptive as
> a
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 12:15:23AM +0200, Henrik Austad wrote:
> This is a respin with a wider audience (all that get_maintainer returned)
> and I know this spams a *lot* of people. Not sure what would be the correct
> way, so my apologies for ruining your inbox.
Acked-by: Mark Brown
This is a respin with a wider audience (all that get_maintainer returned)
and I know this spams a *lot* of people. Not sure what would be the correct
way, so my apologies for ruining your inbox.
The 00-INDEX files are supposed to give a summary of all files present
in a directory, but these files
13 matches
Mail list logo
