On 3/31/23 16:34, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 02:26:33PM +, Emil Abildgaard Svendsen wrote:
>> On 3/31/23 04:55, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
>
>>> There are different requirements for this slot width. Some need physical
>>> width,
>>> Some need format width. We need to be careful
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 02:26:33PM +, Emil Abildgaard Svendsen wrote:
> On 3/31/23 04:55, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > There are different requirements for this slot width. Some need physical
> > width,
> > Some need format width. We need to be careful about change here.
> I might be wrong but
On 3/31/23 04:55, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 4:30 PM Emil Abildgaard Svendsen <
> e...@bang-olufsen.dk> wrote:
>
>> Slot width should follow the physical width of the format instead of the
>> data width.
>>
>> This is needed for formats like SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE where
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 4:30 PM Emil Abildgaard Svendsen <
e...@bang-olufsen.dk> wrote:
> Slot width should follow the physical width of the format instead of the
> data width.
>
> This is needed for formats like SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE where physical
> width is 32 and data width is 24. By using
Slot width should follow the physical width of the format instead of the
data width.
This is needed for formats like SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE where physical
width is 32 and data width is 24. By using the physical width, data
won't get misaligned.
Signed-off-by: Emil Svendsen
---
