On 29/2/24 08:00, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:37:10 +0100,
Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
snd_soc_card_get_kcontrol() must be holding a read lock on
card->controls_rwsem while walking the controls list.
Compare with snd_ctl_find_numid().
The existing function is renamed snd_soc_card
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:37:10 +0100,
Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
>
> snd_soc_card_get_kcontrol() must be holding a read lock on
> card->controls_rwsem while walking the controls list.
>
> Compare with snd_ctl_find_numid().
>
> The existing function is renamed snd_soc_card_get_kcontrol_locked()
> so
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 12:37:10 +, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> snd_soc_card_get_kcontrol() must be holding a read lock on
> card->controls_rwsem while walking the controls list.
>
> Compare with snd_ctl_find_numid().
>
> The existing function is renamed snd_soc_card_get_kcontrol_locked()
> so th
snd_soc_card_get_kcontrol() must be holding a read lock on
card->controls_rwsem while walking the controls list.
Compare with snd_ctl_find_numid().
The existing function is renamed snd_soc_card_get_kcontrol_locked()
so that it can be called from contexts that are already holding
card->controls_rw
