On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 11:27:14PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 10/10/07, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > My main concern is that I don't like the implicit numbering that
> > > occurs simply based on the order of devices in the device tree. If
> > > the probe algorithm ever change
On 10/10/07, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My main concern is that I don't like the implicit numbering that
> > occurs simply based on the order of devices in the device tree. If
> > the probe algorithm ever changes to parse in reverse order or
> > something reorders the tree, then t
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 10:58:25PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 10/10/07, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 10:18:50PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > On 10/10/07, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 08:25:36PM -0600, Grant L
On 10/10/07, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 10:18:50PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On 10/10/07, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 08:25:36PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > > On 10/10/07, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 10:18:50PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 10/10/07, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 08:25:36PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > On 10/10/07, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > We've used 'cell-index' for similar purposes on o
On 10/10/07, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 08:25:36PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On 10/10/07, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > We've used 'cell-index' for similar purposes on other 4xx.
> >
> > Unfortunately, 'cell' has been used in the sense of
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 08:25:36PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 10/10/07, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 03:38:02PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
[snip]
> > > "number" seems a bit to generic to me. logical-number seems a bit more
> > > descriptive.
> >
> > We've
On 10/10/07, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 03:38:02PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 01:53 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > ---
> > >
> >
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 03:38:02PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 01:53 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> >
> > This is a first draft, please review and comment.
>
> I'll start
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 01:53 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> This is a first draft, please review and comment.
I'll start off with the fact that I hardly consider myself a DT expert,
so take what I s
Anybody have any comments on this? Segher? David?
Cheers,
g.
On 10/8/07, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> This is a first draft, please review and comment.
>
> On a side node, I think b
From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This is a first draft, please review and comment.
On a side node, I think booting-without-of.txt could get really unwieldly
in the near future. Perhaps the device tree bindings should be organized
differe
12 matches
Mail list logo