Re: [PATCH] dtc: give advance warning that "-S" is going away.

> The "-S" option allowed the specification of a minimum size for > the blob, however the main reason for caring about the size is > so there is enough padding to add a chosen node by u-boot or > whoever. In which case, folks don't really care about the absolute > size, but rather the size of the

Re: [PATCH] dtc: give advance warning that "-S" is going away.

> The "-S" option allowed the specification of a minimum size for > the blob, however the main reason for caring about the size is > so there is enough padding to add a chosen node by u-boot or > whoever. In which case, folks don't really care about the absolute > size, but rather the size of the

[PATCH] dtc: give advance warning that "-S" is going away.

The "-S" option allowed the specification of a minimum size for the blob, however the main reason for caring about the size is so there is enough padding to add a chosen node by u-boot or whoever. In which case, folks don't really care about the absolute size, but rather the size of the padding ad