On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:11:39 -0500
Joe Lawrence wrote:
> The bisect finally landed on:
>
> 72b3942a173c387b27860ba1069636726e208777 is the first bad commit
> commit 72b3942a173c387b27860ba1069636726e208777
> Author: Yinan Liu
> Date: Sun Dec 12 19:33:58 2021 +0800
>
> scripts:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:42:49AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
>
> First S390 complained that the sorting of the mcount sections at build
> time caused the kernel to crash on their architecture. Now PowerPC is
> complaining about it too. And also ARM64 appears to
Hi Sven,
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:42:35PM +0100, Sven Schnelle wrote:
> Mark Rutland writes:
>
> > * I intermittently see a hang when running the tests. I previously hit that
> > when originally trying to bisect this issue (and IIRC that bisected down
> > to
> > some RCU changes, but I ne
Hi Mark,
Mark Rutland writes:
> * I intermittently see a hang when running the tests. I previously hit that
> when originally trying to bisect this issue (and IIRC that bisected down to
> some RCU changes, but I need to re-run that). When the tests hang I
> magic-srsrq + L tells me:
>
>
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:42:49AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
>
> First S390 complained that the sorting of the mcount sections at build
> time caused the kernel to crash on their architecture. Now PowerPC is
> complaining about it too. And also ARM64 appears t
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
First S390 complained that the sorting of the mcount sections at build
time caused the kernel to crash on their architecture. Now PowerPC is
complaining about it too. And also ARM64 appears to be having issues.
It may be necessary to also update the relocation tab
