2012/6/14 Wolfram Sang :
> Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
> in the core, like we already do with board_info structs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
Acked-by: Barry Song
> ---
>
> Based on v3.5-rc2. Only build tested, I don't have a OF based device
> arou
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
> in the core, like we already do with board_info structs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
Acked-by: Linus Walleij
Lee might be able to test this with his DT bindings
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 11:14 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 07:33:37AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 23:12 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
> > > in the core, like we already
Hi Wolfram,
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:12:10 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
> in the core, like we already do with board_info structs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
> ---
>
> Based on v3.5-rc2. Only build tested, I don't have a
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 23:12 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
> in the core, like we already do with board_info structs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-versatile.c |1 -
> drivers/i2c/i
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 07:33:37AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 23:12 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
> > in the core, like we already do with board_info structs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sa
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
> in the core, like we already do with board_info structs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> b/drivers
> "Wolfram" == Wolfram Sang writes:
Wolfram> Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should
Wolfram> be done in the core, like we already do with board_info
Wolfram> structs.
Wolfram> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
Wolfram> ---
Wolfram> Based on v3.5-rc2. Only build test
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:12:10 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
> in the core, like we already do with board_info structs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
FWIW, and without any actual compiling or testing:
Acked-by: Grant Likely
On 06/13/2012 03:12 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
> in the core, like we already do with board_info structs.
At least on Tegra this works fine,
Tested-by: Stephen Warren
___
Linuxppc-dev
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 23:12 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
> in the core, like we already do with board_info structs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
> ---
>
> Based on v3.5-rc2. Only build tested, I don't have a OF based devic
Currently, every driver has to do it on its own, but it should be done
in the core, like we already do with board_info structs.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
---
Based on v3.5-rc2. Only build tested, I don't have a OF based device
around at the moment.
@Peter: Why does ocores do the device regist
12 matches
Mail list logo
