On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 08:15:01AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> This message leads to think that memory protection is not implemented
> for the said architecture, whereas absence of CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
> only means that memory protection has not been selected at
> compile time.
>
> Don't
This message leads to think that memory protection is not implemented
for the said architecture, whereas absence of CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
only means that memory protection has not been selected at
compile time.
Don't print this message when CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is
selected by the a