Re: [PATCH] net: move from strlcpy with unused retval to strscpy

2022-08-30 Thread Wolfram Sang
> Unfortunately looks like patchwork was unable to ingest this change :( > Not sure why. vger rejected this mail because the header was too big. I updated my scripts to estimate that before sending out. > Would you mind splitting it into 3 chunks - wireless, ethernet, > everything else, and

Re: [PATCH] net: move from strlcpy with unused retval to strscpy

2022-08-22 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 23:00:34 +0200 Wolfram Sang wrote: > 261 files changed, 568 insertions(+), 568 deletions(-) Unfortunately looks like patchwork was unable to ingest this change :( Not sure why. Would you mind splitting it into 3 chunks - wireless, ethernet, everything else, and resending?

Re: [PATCH] net: move from strlcpy with unused retval to strscpy

2022-08-21 Thread Leon Romanovsky
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 11:00:34PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Follow the advice of the below link and prefer 'strscpy' in this > subsystem. Conversion is 1:1 because the return value is not used. > Generated by a coccinelle script. > > Link: >

Re: [PATCH] net: move from strlcpy with unused retval to strscpy

2022-08-19 Thread Tom Lendacky
On 8/18/22 16:00, Wolfram Sang wrote: Follow the advice of the below link and prefer 'strscpy' in this subsystem. Conversion is 1:1 because the return value is not used. Generated by a coccinelle script. Link:

Re: [PATCH] net: move from strlcpy with unused retval to strscpy

2022-08-19 Thread Geoff Levand
Hi Wolfram, On 8/18/22 14:00, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Follow the advice of the below link and prefer 'strscpy' in this > subsystem. Conversion is 1:1 because the return value is not used. > Generated by a coccinelle script. > > Link: >