Re: [PATCH] powernv: Properly mask POWER9 DD1 PVR for different chip types

2017-06-07 Thread Michael Ellerman
Michael Neuling writes: > On Wed, 2017-06-07 at 17:24 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Michael Neuling writes: >> >> > Bits 48:51 in the PVR for POWER9 represent different chip types (scale >> > up vs out and 12 vs 24 core). Current chips have 0 here, but

Re: [PATCH] powernv: Properly mask POWER9 DD1 PVR for different chip types

2017-06-07 Thread Michael Neuling
On Wed, 2017-06-07 at 17:24 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Michael Neuling writes: > > > Bits 48:51 in the PVR for POWER9 represent different chip types (scale > > up vs out and 12 vs 24 core). Current chips have 0 here, but could be > > non-zero in the future. > > > > This

Re: [PATCH] powernv: Properly mask POWER9 DD1 PVR for different chip types

2017-06-07 Thread Michael Ellerman
Michael Neuling writes: > Bits 48:51 in the PVR for POWER9 represent different chip types (scale > up vs out and 12 vs 24 core). Current chips have 0 here, but could be > non-zero in the future. > > This changes the POWER9 DD1 mask to correctly ignore these bits 48:51. > >

[PATCH] powernv: Properly mask POWER9 DD1 PVR for different chip types

2017-06-06 Thread Michael Neuling
Bits 48:51 in the PVR for POWER9 represent different chip types (scale up vs out and 12 vs 24 core). Current chips have 0 here, but could be non-zero in the future. This changes the POWER9 DD1 mask to correctly ignore these bits 48:51. Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling ---