Re: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Add back condition for smp

2012-04-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Apr 17, 2012, at 4:39 PM, York Sun wrote: The timebase synchronization is only necessary if we need to reset a separate core. Currently only KEXEC and CPU hotplug require resetting a single core. The following code should be in the condition of CONFIG_KEXEC or CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Add back condition for smp

2012-04-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Apr 17, 2012, at 5:17 PM, Scott Wood wrote: On 04/17/2012 04:39 PM, York Sun wrote: The timebase synchronization is only necessary if we need to reset a separate core. Currently only KEXEC and CPU hotplug require resetting a single core. The following code should be in the condition of

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Add back condition for smp

2012-04-18 Thread Scott Wood
On 04/18/2012 09:15 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: On Apr 17, 2012, at 5:17 PM, Scott Wood wrote: On 04/17/2012 04:39 PM, York Sun wrote: The timebase synchronization is only necessary if we need to reset a separate core. Currently only KEXEC and CPU hotplug require resetting a single core. The

[PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Add back condition for smp

2012-04-17 Thread York Sun
The timebase synchronization is only necessary if we need to reset a separate core. Currently only KEXEC and CPU hotplug require resetting a single core. The following code should be in the condition of CONFIG_KEXEC or CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU .give_timebase = smp_generic_give_timebase,

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Add back condition for smp

2012-04-17 Thread Scott Wood
On 04/17/2012 04:39 PM, York Sun wrote: The timebase synchronization is only necessary if we need to reset a separate core. Currently only KEXEC and CPU hotplug require resetting a single core. The following code should be in the condition of CONFIG_KEXEC or CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU