We are seeing a lot of PMU warnings on POWER8:
Can't find PMC that caused IRQ
Looking closer, the active PMC is 0 at this point and we took a PMU
exception on the transition from negative to 0. Some versions of POWER8
have an issue where they edge detect and not level detect PMC overflows.
A number of places program the PMC with (0x80000000 - period_left),
where period_left can be negative. We can either fix all of these or
just ensure that period_left is always >= 1.
This patch takes the second option.
Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <an...@samba.org>
---
Attached is a graph that shows how this bug also causes problems in the
initial period calculation for samples. Once fixed we converge on
the correct period very quickly.
Index: b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
===================================================================
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -996,7 +996,22 @@ static void power_pmu_read(struct perf_e
} while (local64_cmpxchg(&event->hw.prev_count, prev, val) != prev);
local64_add(delta, &event->count);
- local64_sub(delta, &event->hw.period_left);
+
+ /*
+ * A number of places program the PMC with (0x80000000 - period_left).
+ * We never want period_left to be less than 1 because we will program
+ * the PMC with a value >= 0x800000000 and an edge detected PMC will
+ * roll around to 0 before taking an exception. We have seen this
+ * on POWER8.
+ *
+ * To fix this, clamp the minimum value of period_left to 1.
+ */
+ do {
+ prev = local64_read(&event->hw.period_left);
+ val = prev - delta;
+ if (val < 1)
+ val = 1;
+ } while (local64_cmpxchg(&event->hw.period_left, prev, val) != prev);
}
/*
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
