Re: [PATCH] powerpc/security: Fix Speculation_Store_Bypass reporting on Power10

On Wed, 17 May 2023 17:49:45 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Nageswara reported that /proc/self/status was showing "vulnerable" for > the Speculation_Store_Bypass feature on Power10, eg: > > $ grep Speculation_Store_Bypass: /proc/self/status > Speculation_Store_Bypass: vulnerable > > B

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/security: Fix Speculation_Store_Bypass reporting on Power10

On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 17:49 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Nageswara reported that /proc/self/status was showing "vulnerable" > for > the Speculation_Store_Bypass feature on Power10, eg: > >   $ grep Speculation_Store_Bypass: /proc/self/status >   Speculation_Store_Bypass:   vulnerable > >

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/security: Fix Speculation_Store_Bypass reporting on Power10

On 17/05/23 1:19 pm, Michael Ellerman wrote: Nageswara reported that /proc/self/status was showing "vulnerable" for the Speculation_Store_Bypass feature on Power10, eg: $ grep Speculation_Store_Bypass: /proc/self/status Speculation_Store_Bypass: vulnerable But at the same time th

[PATCH] powerpc/security: Fix Speculation_Store_Bypass reporting on Power10

Nageswara reported that /proc/self/status was showing "vulnerable" for the Speculation_Store_Bypass feature on Power10, eg: $ grep Speculation_Store_Bypass: /proc/self/status Speculation_Store_Bypass: vulnerable But at the same time the sysfs files, and lscpu, were showing "Not affected