On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:14:40 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Commit b0b3b2c78ec0 ("powerpc: Switch to relative jump labels") switched
> us to using relative jump labels. That involves changing the code,
> target and key members in struct jump_entry to be relative to the
> address of the
Roman Bolshakov writes:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:14:40PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Commit b0b3b2c78ec0 ("powerpc: Switch to relative jump labels") switched
>> us to using relative jump labels. That involves changing the code,
>> target and key members in struct jump_entry to be
> On 14 Jun 2021, at 16:14, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> Commit b0b3b2c78ec0 ("powerpc: Switch to relative jump labels") switched
> us to using relative jump labels. That involves changing the code,
> target and key members in struct jump_entry to be relative to the
> address of the jump_entry,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:14:40PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Commit b0b3b2c78ec0 ("powerpc: Switch to relative jump labels") switched
> us to using relative jump labels. That involves changing the code,
> target and key members in struct jump_entry to be relative to the
> address of the
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:57:40 +0200
Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:14:40 +1000
> Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> > Commit b0b3b2c78ec0 ("powerpc: Switch to relative jump labels") switched
> > us to using relative jump labels. That involves changing the code,
> > target and key members in
Hi Michael,
> The fix is simply to make the key value relative to the jump_entry
> struct in the ARCH_STATIC_BRANCH macro.
This fixes the boot issues I observed. Thank you very much!!
Tested-by: Daniel Axtens
Kind regards,
Daniel
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:14:40 +1000
Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Commit b0b3b2c78ec0 ("powerpc: Switch to relative jump labels") switched
> us to using relative jump labels. That involves changing the code,
> target and key members in struct jump_entry to be relative to the
> address of the
Commit b0b3b2c78ec0 ("powerpc: Switch to relative jump labels") switched
us to using relative jump labels. That involves changing the code,
target and key members in struct jump_entry to be relative to the
address of the jump_entry, rather than absolute addresses.
We have two static inlines that
