On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> Out of interest, why is it %pS and not %Sp? Shouldn't the modifier come
> first? What if we want to print a pointer immediately followed by a
> capital S?
Try it.
Linus
___
Linu
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 10:08 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > This changes the oops and backtrace code to use the new %pS
> > printk extension to print out symbols rather than manually
> > calling print_symbol.
>
> Ok, I ended up committing th
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 10:08 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > This changes the oops and backtrace code to use the new %pS
> > printk extension to print out symbols rather than manually
> > calling print_symbol.
>
> Ok, I ended up committing the suppor for '%pS' early (as a series of
> smaller patc
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> This changes the oops and backtrace code to use the new %pS
> printk extension to print out symbols rather than manually
> calling print_symbol.
Ok, I ended up committing the suppor for '%pS' early (as a series of
smaller patches to make it
This changes the oops and backtrace code to use the new %pS
printk extension to print out symbols rather than manually
calling print_symbol.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 14 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions
