On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:15:18AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 17:53 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2015-03-07 at 19:19 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> > > It makes no sense to use a variant lock token on a platform which
> > > doesn't support for shared-proce
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 17:53 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-03-07 at 19:19 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> > It makes no sense to use a variant lock token on a platform which
> > doesn't support for shared-processor logical partitions. Actually we
> > can eliminate a memory load by us
On Sat, 2015-03-07 at 19:19 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> It makes no sense to use a variant lock token on a platform which
> doesn't support for shared-processor logical partitions. Actually we
> can eliminate a memory load by using a fixed lock token on these
> platforms.
Does this provide an actual
It makes no sense to use a variant lock token on a platform which
doesn't support for shared-processor logical partitions. Actually we
can eliminate a memory load by using a fixed lock token on these
platforms.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h | 8 ++--
1 file
