On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 10:16 +0800, Liu Dave-R63238 wrote:
Not looking at the code right now ... but do we have the same
issue on 64e ?
Aaron pointed the issue on FSL BookE.
http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2010-January/079738.html
Right, but I think 64-bit BookE has the
Aaron pointed the issue on FSL BookE.
http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2010-January/079738.htm
l
Right, but I think 64-bit BookE has the same issue. We can
fix that later tho.
Ben,
We also find the _PAGE_USER is different between pte-book3e and old
fsl-booke
It is UR
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 17:14 +0800, Liu Dave-R63238 wrote:
Aaron pointed the issue on FSL BookE.
http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2010-January/079738.htm
l
Right, but I think 64-bit BookE has the same issue. We can
fix that later tho.
Ben,
We also find the
On May 7, 2010, at 3:38 AM, Li Yang wrote:
Check the user/supervisor execution permission base on the code address.
This fixes the following oops on module loading or removing.
Unable to handle kernel paging request for instruction fetch
Faulting instruction address: 0xf938d040
Oops:
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 14:14 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On May 7, 2010, at 3:38 AM, Li Yang wrote:
Check the user/supervisor execution permission base on the code address.
This fixes the following oops on module loading or removing.
Unable to handle kernel paging request for instruction
I've updated the commit message to be a bit more clear on why
we need to do this.
I'm curious why the _PAGE_EXEC have different definition in pte-book3e.h
and pte-fsl-booke.h?
It is UX permission in pte-book3e, but is SX permission in
pte-fsl-booke.h.
Thanks, Dave
Not looking at the code right now ... but do we have the same
issue on 64e ?
Aaron pointed the issue on FSL BookE.
http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2010-January/079738.html
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 14:14 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On May 7, 2010, at 3:38 AM, Li Yang wrote:
Check the user/supervisor execution permission base on the code address.
This fixes the following oops on module loading or removing.
Unable to handle kernel paging request for instruction
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 08:53 +0800, Liu Dave-R63238 wrote:
I've updated the commit message to be a bit more clear on why
we need to do this.
I'm curious why the _PAGE_EXEC have different definition in pte-book3e.h
and pte-fsl-booke.h?
It is UX permission in pte-book3e, but is SX
On May 13, 2010, at 10:36 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 14:14 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On May 7, 2010, at 3:38 AM, Li Yang wrote:
Check the user/supervisor execution permission base on the code address.
This fixes the following oops on module loading or removing.
Check the user/supervisor execution permission base on the code address.
This fixes the following oops on module loading or removing.
Unable to handle kernel paging request for instruction fetch
Faulting instruction address: 0xf938d040
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
Signed-off-by:
11 matches
Mail list logo
