On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:26:34 +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> > Jochen, I'm a bit confused by the dependencies that exist - or not -
> > between these 7 patches you sent at once. I thought they had to be
> > applied in sequence but it seems not? And some of them should
> > apparently
On Wednesday 23 April 2008 14:47, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:12:37 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday 23 April 2008 13:16, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > I still don't know exactly what happened there... I think I saw some
> > > "OpenFirmware i2c" patches go upstream yeste
On 4/23/08, Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
>
> > Jochen, I'm a bit confused by the dependencies that exist - or not -
> > between these 7 patches you sent at once. I thought they had to be
> > applied in sequence but it seems not? And some of them should
> > apparently
Hi Jean,
> Jochen, I'm a bit confused by the dependencies that exist - or not -
> between these 7 patches you sent at once. I thought they had to be
> applied in sequence but it seems not? And some of them should
> apparently go through me i2c tree but others (e.g. [7/7]) not?
[1/7] and [2/7] are
On 4/23/08, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:11:56 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Jean,
> >
> > On Saturday 19 April 2008 18:43, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> > > Jean Delvare wrote:
>
> > > > I'm not sure. I didn't have the time to look at
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:12:37 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 April 2008 13:16, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > I still don't know exactly what happened there... I think I saw some
> > "OpenFirmware i2c" patches go upstream yesterday? But not the ones
> > listed below, which I thought they
Hi Jean,
On Wednesday 23 April 2008 13:16, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:11:56 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Jean,
> >
> > On Saturday 19 April 2008 18:43, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> > > Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > > I'm not sure. I didn't have the time to loo
Hi Stefan,
> Please don't get we wrong, I didn't want to put additional pressure on you
> here. I just wanted to express that I'm waiting for these patches to arrive
> upstream quite some time now too.
and unfortunately, the longer we wait the more drivers are ported to new-style
and the bigger
On Wednesday 23 April 2008, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > The patches are required for long awaited I2C support on various
> > > PowerPC boards. As the ppc architecture support is going away in
> > > 2.6.27, it would be nice to have them applied in 2.6.26.
> >
> > Yes, please.
>
> I know that many peop
Hi Laurent,
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:11:56 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> On Saturday 19 April 2008 18:43, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> > Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > I'm not sure. I didn't have the time to look at it myself, but I am
> > > under the impression that the powerpc folks are t
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:12:48 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Monday 21 April 2008, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > > Is there any chance they will got to 2.6.26?
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure. I didn't have the time to look at it myself, but I am
> > > > under the impression that the powerpc folks a
Hi Jean,
On Saturday 19 April 2008 18:43, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:09:55 +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> >> Hi Jean,
> >>
> > Is the new-style driver conversion patch in 2.6.25-rc8-mm2 scheduled
> > for 2.6.26 ?
> hope so! :)
> >>> Not
On Monday 21 April 2008, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > Is there any chance they will got to 2.6.26?
> > >
> > > I'm not sure. I didn't have the time to look at it myself, but I am
> > > under the impression that the powerpc folks are tired of having to wait
> > > for me and may push it to Linus t
On Saturday 19 April 2008 18:43, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:09:55 +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> > > Hi Jean,
> > >
> > > > > > Is the new-style driver conversion patch in 2.6.25-rc8-mm2
> > > > > > scheduled for 2.6.26 ?
> > > > > hope so! :)
> > >
Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:09:55 +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
>> Hi Jean,
>>
> Is the new-style driver conversion patch in 2.6.25-rc8-mm2 scheduled for
> 2.6.26 ?
hope so! :)
>>> Note that this patch depends on i2c patches which aren't upstream yet.
>> Is there any
On Apr 17, 2008, at 10:02 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi,
here's a patch against 2.6.25-rc8-mm2 that adds support for device
tree names
to the rtc-pcf8563 driver.
Is the new-style driver conversion patch in 2.6.25-rc8-mm2 scheduled
for
2.6.26 ?
Should probably include the rtc & i2c mai
Hi,
here's a patch against 2.6.25-rc8-mm2 that adds support for device tree names
to the rtc-pcf8563 driver.
Is the new-style driver conversion patch in 2.6.25-rc8-mm2 scheduled for
2.6.26 ?
--
This patch adds support for device tree names via the i2c mod alias mechanism
to the rtc-pcf8563 driv
17 matches
Mail list logo
