Rafał Miłecki zajec5-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org writes:
+/**
+ * Workarounds.
+ **/
+
+static u8 ssb_pcicore_polarity_workaround(struct ssb_pcicore *pc)
+{
+ return
On 05/31/2011 04:37 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Rafał Miłeckizajec5-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org writes:
+/**
+ * Workarounds.
+ **/
+
+static u8 ssb_pcicore_polarity_workaround(struct
Larry Finger larry.fin...@lwfinger.net writes:
From the traceback, it must be the serdes_pll_device read that failed.
Why not ssb_pcicore_polarity_workaround (note r4 == 0x134)?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B
On 05/31/2011 10:54 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Larry Fingerlarry.fin...@lwfinger.net writes:
From the traceback, it must be the serdes_pll_device read that failed.
Why not ssb_pcicore_polarity_workaround (note r4 == 0x134)?
Mainly because the last two steps in the traceback are
Larry Finger larry.fin...@lwfinger.net writes:
On 05/31/2011 10:54 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Larry Fingerlarry.fin...@lwfinger.net writes:
From the traceback, it must be the serdes_pll_device read that failed.
Why not ssb_pcicore_polarity_workaround (note r4 == 0x134)?
Mainly because
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org writes:
Larry Finger larry.fin...@lwfinger.net writes:
On 05/31/2011 10:54 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Larry Fingerlarry.fin...@lwfinger.net writes:
From the traceback, it must be the serdes_pll_device read that failed.
Why not
