TIF_IA32 is set during the execution of a 32-bit system call - so touched on
each compat system call. Is this the actual flag you want? A 32-bit address
space flag is different from TIF_IA32.
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon any lack of formatting.
Stephen Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Mar
Sorry... I confused them too. It's TS_COMPAT which is problematic.
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon any lack of formatting.
Stephen Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:38:09AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10,
2011 at 08:00:32AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Tue, Mar
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:54:14AM -0500, Stephen Wilson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:38:09AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:00:32AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:31:56PM -0500, Stephen Wilson wrote:
> > > > The only architecture this c
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:38:09AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:00:32AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:31:56PM -0500, Stephen Wilson wrote:
> > > The only architecture this change impacts in any significant way is
> > > x86_64.
> > > The principle
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:00:32AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:31:56PM -0500, Stephen Wilson wrote:
> >
> > Morally, the question of whether an address lies in a gate vma should be
> > asked
> > with respect to an mm, not a particular task.
> >
> > Practically, droppin
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:00:32AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:31:56PM -0500, Stephen Wilson wrote:
> >
> > Morally, the question of whether an address lies in a gate vma should be
> > asked
> > with respect to an mm, not a particular task.
> >
> > Practically, dropping
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:31:56PM -0500, Stephen Wilson wrote:
>
> Morally, the question of whether an address lies in a gate vma should be asked
> with respect to an mm, not a particular task.
>
> Practically, dropping the dependency on task_struct will help make current and
> future operations
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Stephen Wilson wrote:
> Morally, the question of whether an address lies in a gate vma should be asked
> with respect to an mm, not a particular task.
>
> Practically, dropping the dependency on task_struct will help make current and
> future operations on mm's more
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 05:09:09AM -0800, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Stephen Wilson wrote:
> > Morally, the question of whether an address lies in a gate vma should be
> > asked
> > with respect to an mm, not a particular task.
> >
> > Practically, dropping the dep
Morally, the question of whether an address lies in a gate vma should be asked
with respect to an mm, not a particular task.
Practically, dropping the dependency on task_struct will help make current and
future operations on mm's more flexible and convenient. In particular, it
allows some code p
10 matches
Mail list logo
