On Fri, 2 Jun 2023, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 6:37 AM Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> > The most obvious vital thing (in the split ptlock case) is that it
> > remains a struct page with a usable ptl spinlock embedded in it.
> >
> > The question becomes more urgent when/if extending to
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 6:37 AM Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2023, Jann Horn wrote:
> > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 8:11 AM Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > Here is the third series of patches to mm (and a few architectures), based
> > > on v6.4-rc3 with the preceding two series applied: in which
On Wed, 31 May 2023, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 8:11 AM Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > Here is the third series of patches to mm (and a few architectures), based
> > on v6.4-rc3 with the preceding two series applied: in which khugepaged
> > takes advantage of pte_offset_map[_lock]()
On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 8:11 AM Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Here is the third series of patches to mm (and a few architectures), based
> on v6.4-rc3 with the preceding two series applied: in which khugepaged
> takes advantage of pte_offset_map[_lock]() allowing for pmd transitions.
To clarify: Part of
Here is the third series of patches to mm (and a few architectures), based
on v6.4-rc3 with the preceding two series applied: in which khugepaged
takes advantage of pte_offset_map[_lock]() allowing for pmd transitions.
This follows on from the "arch: allow pte_offset_map[_lock]() to fail"
