On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Roman Fietze
wrote:
> On Monday 11 January 2010 20:21:22 Grant Likely wrote:
>> Why is the list head being removed?
>
> Not used at all, except in initialization?
>
> Of course a seperate patch would have been needed.
For the record, I put the list_head in when w
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Roman Fietze
wrote:
> Hello Grant,
>
> On Monday 11 January 2010 20:21:22 Grant Likely wrote:
>
>> Unrelated whitespace change?
>
> My fault, as with some other white space changes. My Emacs is
> configured using some older setup found in a 2.4
> Documentation/Cod
Hello Grant,
On Monday 11 January 2010 20:21:22 Grant Likely wrote:
> Unrelated whitespace change?
My fault, as with some other white space changes. My Emacs is
configured using some older setup found in a 2.4
Documentation/CodingStyle. Before saving a file my spine is used to
reformat the whole
Dear Grant Likely,
In message you
wrote:
>
> > /* mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c */
> > #define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_READ (0)
> > -#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE (1<<0)
> > -#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_INCREMENT (1<<1)
> > -#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Roman Fietze
wrote:
>
This should probably be merged with the first patch to actually use
the bit definitions. More comments below.
> Signed-off-by: Roman Fietze
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h | 40 +++
> 1 files
Signed-off-by: Roman Fietze
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h | 40 +++
1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h
index 57f8335..c659d1d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc
