On Tue, 16 Jul 2024, Mike Rapoport wrote:\n
From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)"
Every architecture that supports NUMA defines node_data in the same way:
struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES];
No reason to keep multiple copies of this definition and its forward
declarations, especi
On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 14:13:33 +0300
Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)"
>
> Every architecture that supports NUMA defines node_data in the same way:
>
> struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES];
>
> No reason to keep multiple copies of this definition and its forw
On 16.07.24 13:13, Mike Rapoport wrote:
From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)"
Every architecture that supports NUMA defines node_data in the same way:
struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES];
No reason to keep multiple copies of this definition and its forward
declarations, especially
From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)"
Every architecture that supports NUMA defines node_data in the same way:
struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES];
No reason to keep multiple copies of this definition and its forward
declarations, especially when such forward declaration is the only