Re: [PATCH 06/11] powerpc/smp: Generalize 2nd sched domain

2020-07-20 Thread Gautham R Shenoy
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 11:49:11AM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > * Gautham R Shenoy [2020-07-17 12:07:55]: > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:06:19AM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > > Currently "CACHE" domain happens to be the 2nd sched domain as per > > > powerpc_topology. This domain

Re: [PATCH 06/11] powerpc/smp: Generalize 2nd sched domain

2020-07-20 Thread Srikar Dronamraju
* Gautham R Shenoy [2020-07-17 12:07:55]: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:06:19AM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > Currently "CACHE" domain happens to be the 2nd sched domain as per > > powerpc_topology. This domain will collapse if cpumask of l2-cache is > > same as SMT domain. However we could

Re: [PATCH 06/11] powerpc/smp: Generalize 2nd sched domain

2020-07-17 Thread Gautham R Shenoy
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:06:19AM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > Currently "CACHE" domain happens to be the 2nd sched domain as per > powerpc_topology. This domain will collapse if cpumask of l2-cache is > same as SMT domain. However we could generalize this domain such that it > could mean

[PATCH 06/11] powerpc/smp: Generalize 2nd sched domain

2020-07-13 Thread Srikar Dronamraju
Currently "CACHE" domain happens to be the 2nd sched domain as per powerpc_topology. This domain will collapse if cpumask of l2-cache is same as SMT domain. However we could generalize this domain such that it could mean either be a "CACHE" domain or a "BIGCORE" domain. While setting up the