On 09/05/2022 13:14, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> [...]>
> I have queued this to coresight/next.
>
> Thanks
> Suzuki
Thanks a lot Suzuki!
Hi
On 09/05/2022 14:09, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
On 28/04/2022 05:11, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
Hi Guilherme,
On 27/04/2022 23:49, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
The panic notifier infrastructure executes registered callbacks when
a panic event happens - such callbacks are executed in atomic co
On 28/04/2022 05:11, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Hi Guilherme,
>
> On 27/04/2022 23:49, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
>> The panic notifier infrastructure executes registered callbacks when
>> a panic event happens - such callbacks are executed in atomic context,
>> with interrupts and preemption disa
On 28/04/2022 05:11, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Hi Guilherme,
> [...]
> How would you like to proceed with queuing this ? I am happy
> either way. In case you plan to push this as part of this
> series (I don't see any potential conflicts) :
>
> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose
Thanks for your revi
Hi Guilherme,
On 27/04/2022 23:49, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
The panic notifier infrastructure executes registered callbacks when
a panic event happens - such callbacks are executed in atomic context,
with interrupts and preemption disabled in the running CPU and all other
CPUs disabled. That
The panic notifier infrastructure executes registered callbacks when
a panic event happens - such callbacks are executed in atomic context,
with interrupts and preemption disabled in the running CPU and all other
CPUs disabled. That said, mutexes in such context are not a good idea.
This patch rep
