It was discussed[1] that we should match on the first (most specific)
entry in the device tree.
The most lengthy I2C compatible entry for the MPC8349E-mITX MCU
devices is mc9s08qg8-mpc8349emitx (w/o vendor name). This means
that we have to allow longer IDs to be used in the I2C subsystem.
[1]
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:03:39 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
It was discussed[1] that we should match on the first (most specific)
entry in the device tree.
The most lengthy I2C compatible entry for the MPC8349E-mITX MCU
devices is mc9s08qg8-mpc8349emitx (w/o vendor name). This means
that we
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:03:08PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:03:39 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
It was discussed[1] that we should match on the first (most specific)
entry in the device tree.
The most lengthy I2C compatible entry for the MPC8349E-mITX MCU