On 19/09/07 13:47 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Domen Puncer writes:
Paul, what do you say about this?
Sylvain suggested it could also be integrated with define_machine
interface.
As it stands, your patch adds the clk_* functions on all platforms.
What platforms would actually want to
Domen Puncer writes:
52xx
Reason for adding it to all was that EXPORT_SYMBOL's would clash if
one were to add clk support for another platform.
What I meant was, why aren't you using a config symbol so that we
don't build it on platforms that don't need any clk support at all?
Paul.
Domen Puncer writes:
Paul, what do you say about this?
Sylvain suggested it could also be integrated with define_machine
interface.
As it stands, your patch adds the clk_* functions on all platforms.
What platforms would actually want to use them?
Paul.
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:28:07AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
It doesn't make any assumption on struct clk, it's just a
wrapper around functions from clk.h.
Point of this patch was to abstract exported functions, since
arch/powerpc/ can support multiple platfroms in one binary.
So...
On 11/07/07 21:34 +0100, Russell King wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:02:54AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:56:58AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Umm, this is about the fifth almost identical implementation
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:02:54AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:56:58AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Umm, this is about the fifth almost identical implementation of
the clk_ functions. Please, please put it
