On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 09:00:52AM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> > Oh nice, that gets rid of the multiple atomics, and it nicely splits
> > this nohz logic into per topology groups -- now if only we could split
> > the rest too :-)
>
> I am sorry, I don't get you here. By the 'rest', do you refe
Hi Peter,
On 10/28/2013 07:20 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 01:37:38PM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
>> kernel/sched/core.c |5 +
>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 38 --
>> kernel/sched/sched.h |1 +
>> 3 files changed, 26 insertio
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 01:37:38PM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> kernel/sched/core.c |5 +
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 38 --
> kernel/sched/sched.h |1 +
> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/
Hi Vincent,
I have addressed your comments and below is the fresh patch. This patch
applies on PATCH 2/3 posted in this thread.
Regards
Preeti U Murthy
sched:Remove un-necessary iterations over sched domains to update/query
nr_busy_cpus
From: Preeti U Murthy
nr_busy_cpus parameter is used b
Hi Preeti
On 23 October 2013 11:50, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> Hi Peter
>
> On 10/23/2013 03:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> This nohz stuff really needs to be re-thought and made more scalable --
>> its a royal pain :/
>
> Why not do something like the below instead? It does the following.
>
> Th
Hi Peter
On 10/23/2013 03:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> This nohz stuff really needs to be re-thought and made more scalable --
> its a royal pain :/
Why not do something like the below instead? It does the following.
This patch introduces sd_busy just like your suggested patch, except that
it
On 10/23/2013 09:30 AM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 10/23/2013 03:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 05:14:42PM +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
>>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 19 +--
>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>>
Hi Peter,
On 10/23/2013 03:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 05:14:42PM +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 19 +--
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 05:14:42PM +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 19 +--
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 7c70201..12f0eab 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> ++
Hi Kamalesh,
On 10/22/2013 08:05 PM, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> * Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [2013-10-21 17:14:42]:
>
>> for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
>> -struct sched_group *sg = sd->groups;
>> -struct sched_group_power *sgp = sg->sgp;
>> -int nr_busy = atomic_
* Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [2013-10-21 17:14:42]:
> for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
> - struct sched_group *sg = sd->groups;
> - struct sched_group_power *sgp = sg->sgp;
> - int nr_busy = atomic_read(&sgp->nr_busy_cpus);
> -
> - if (sd->flags & SD_S
From: Preeti U Murthy
In nohz_kick_needed() there are checks around the flags
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES which decide to initiate nohz_balance if the
domains with this flag set have more than one cpu busy. Therefore at
every domain, a check has to be made on nr_busy of that domain. This
means the sum
12 matches
Mail list logo
