Hi Alexei,
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 12:00:50PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:40 AM Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> >
> > Hi Yonghong,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 08:05:36PM -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
> > >
> > > On 1/9/24 2:16 PM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > > re
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:40 AM Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>
> Hi Yonghong,
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 08:05:36PM -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
> >
> > On 1/9/24 2:16 PM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > reviews.llvm.org was LLVM's Phabricator instances for code review. It
> > > has been abandoned in
Hi Yonghong,
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 08:05:36PM -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
>
> On 1/9/24 2:16 PM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > reviews.llvm.org was LLVM's Phabricator instances for code review. It
> > has been abandoned in favor of GitHub pull requests. While the majority
> > of links in the ker
On 1/9/24 2:16 PM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
reviews.llvm.org was LLVM's Phabricator instances for code review. It
has been abandoned in favor of GitHub pull requests. While the majority
of links in the kernel sources still work because of the work Fangrui
has done turning the dynamic Phabricato
reviews.llvm.org was LLVM's Phabricator instances for code review. It
has been abandoned in favor of GitHub pull requests. While the majority
of links in the kernel sources still work because of the work Fangrui
has done turning the dynamic Phabricator instance into a static archive,
there are some
