Hello Anton,
On 09/17/2014 07:15 AM, Anton Blanchard wrote:
At the moment we transition from the memblock alloctor to the bootmem
allocator. Gitting rid of the bootmem allocator removes a bunch of
complicated code (most of which I owe the dubious honour of being
responsible for writing).
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 01:00 -0500, Emil Medve wrote:
On 09/17/2014 07:15 AM, Anton Blanchard wrote:
At the moment we transition from the memblock alloctor to the bootmem
allocator. Gitting rid of the bootmem allocator removes a bunch of
complicated code (most of which I owe the dubious
Hello Michael,
On 10/30/2014 09:15 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 01:00 -0500, Emil Medve wrote:
On 09/17/2014 07:15 AM, Anton Blanchard wrote:
At the moment we transition from the memblock alloctor to the bootmem
allocator. Gitting rid of the bootmem allocator removes a
At the moment we transition from the memblock alloctor to the bootmem
allocator. Gitting rid of the bootmem allocator removes a bunch of
complicated code (most of which I owe the dubious honour of being
responsible for writing).
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard an...@samba.org
Tested-by: Emil Medve
At the moment we transition from the memblock alloctor to the bootmem
allocator. Gitting rid of the bootmem allocator removes a bunch of
complicated code (most of which I owe the dubious honour of being
responsible for writing).
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard an...@samba.org
---
At the moment we transition from the memblock alloctor to the bootmem
allocator. Removing the bootmem allocator removes a bunch of complicated
code (most of which I owe the dubious honour of being responsible for
writing).
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard an...@samba.org
---
Index:
