[PATCH 1/9] powerpc: Fix msr setting in 32 bit signal code

If we set the SPE MSR bit in save_user_regs we can blow away the VEC bit. This doesn't matter in reality as they are infact the same bit but looks bad. Also, when we add VSX in a later patch, we need to be able to set two separate MSR bits here. Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [PATCH 1/9] powerpc: Fix msr setting in 32 bit signal code

On Jun 24, 2008, at 5:57 AM, Michael Neuling wrote: If we set the SPE MSR bit in save_user_regs we can blow away the VEC bit. This doesn't matter in reality as they are infact the same bit but looks bad. Also, when we add VSX in a later patch, we need to be able to set two separate MSR bits h

[PATCH 1/9] powerpc: Fix msr setting in 32 bit signal code

If we set the SPE MSR bit in save_user_regs we can blow away the VEC bit. This doesn't matter in reality as they are infact the same bit but looks bad. Also, when we add VSX in a later patch, we need to be able to set two separate MSR bits here. Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [PATCH 1/9] powerpc: Fix msr setting in 32 bit signal code

On Jun 23, 2008, at 2:38 AM, Michael Neuling wrote: If we set the SPE MSR bit in save_user_regs we can blow away the VEC bit. This will never happen in reality (VMX and SPE will never be in the same processor as their opcodes overlap), but it looks bad. Also when we add VSX here in a later pa

[PATCH 1/9] powerpc: Fix msr setting in 32 bit signal code

If we set the SPE MSR bit in save_user_regs we can blow away the VEC bit. This will never happen in reality (VMX and SPE will never be in the same processor as their opcodes overlap), but it looks bad. Also when we add VSX here in a later patch, we can hit two of these at the same time. Signed

[PATCH 1/9] powerpc: Fix msr setting in 32 bit signal code

If we set the SPE MSR bit in save_user_regs we can blow away the VEC bit. This will never happen in reality (VMX and SPE will never be in the same processor as their opcodes overlap), but it looks bad. Also when we add VSX here in a later patch, we can hit two of these at the same time. Signed

Re: [PATCH 1/9] powerpc: Fix msr setting in 32 bit signal code

On Jun 19, 2008, at 11:13 PM, Michael Neuling wrote: If we set the SPE MSR bit in save_user_regs we can blow away the VEC bit. This will never happen in reality (VMX and SPE will never be in the same processor as their opcodes overlap), but it looks bad. Also when we add VSX here in a later p

[PATCH 1/9] powerpc: Fix msr setting in 32 bit signal code

If we set the SPE MSR bit in save_user_regs we can blow away the VEC bit. This will never happen in reality (VMX and SPE will never be in the same processor as their opcodes overlap), but it looks bad. Also when we add VSX here in a later patch, we can hit two of these at the same time. Signed

Re: [PATCH 1/9] powerpc: Fix msr setting in 32 bit signal code

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > On Jun 17, 2008, at 7:47 PM, Michael Neuling wrote: > > > If we set the SPE MSR bit in save_user_regs we can blow away the VEC > > bit. This will never happen in reality, but it looks bad. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: [PATCH 1/9] powerpc: Fix msr setting in 32 bit signal code

On Jun 17, 2008, at 7:47 PM, Michael Neuling wrote: If we set the SPE MSR bit in save_user_regs we can blow away the VEC bit. This will never happen in reality, but it looks bad. Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c | 10 ++ 1 file c

[PATCH 1/9] powerpc: Fix msr setting in 32 bit signal code

If we set the SPE MSR bit in save_user_regs we can blow away the VEC bit. This will never happen in reality, but it looks bad. Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c | 10 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Index: linux-