On Wed 26-09-18 16:43:35, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:36:48AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 26-09-18 11:31:27, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Fri 14-09-18 15:10:29, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > > With the align parameter memblock_alloc_node() can be used as drop in
> > > >
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:36:48AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 26-09-18 11:31:27, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 14-09-18 15:10:29, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > With the align parameter memblock_alloc_node() can be used as drop in
> > > replacement for alloc_bootmem_pages_node() and __alloc_b
On Wed 26-09-18 11:31:27, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 14-09-18 15:10:29, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > With the align parameter memblock_alloc_node() can be used as drop in
> > replacement for alloc_bootmem_pages_node() and __alloc_bootmem_node(),
> > which is done in the following patches.
>
> /me co
On Fri 14-09-18 15:10:29, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> With the align parameter memblock_alloc_node() can be used as drop in
> replacement for alloc_bootmem_pages_node() and __alloc_bootmem_node(),
> which is done in the following patches.
/me confused. Why do we need this patch at all? Maybe it should
With the align parameter memblock_alloc_node() can be used as drop in
replacement for alloc_bootmem_pages_node() and __alloc_bootmem_node(),
which is done in the following patches.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport
---
include/linux/bootmem.h | 4 ++--
mm/sparse.c | 2 +-
2 files changed,
