Re: [PATCH 16/28] 8xx: Don't call non-existent Soft_emulate_8xx from SoftwareEmulation.

2007-09-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 17, 2007, at 11:57 AM, Scott Wood wrote: On arch/ppc, Soft_emulate_8xx was used when full math emulation was turned off to emulate a minimal subset of floating point load/store instructions, to avoid needing a soft-float toolchain. This function is called, but not present, on

Re: [PATCH 16/28] 8xx: Don't call non-existent Soft_emulate_8xx from SoftwareEmulation.

2007-09-18 Thread Scott Wood
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 10:08:50AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: On Sep 17, 2007, at 11:57 AM, Scott Wood wrote: On arch/ppc, Soft_emulate_8xx was used when full math emulation was turned off to emulate a minimal subset of floating point load/store instructions, to avoid needing a soft-float

Re: [PATCH 16/28] 8xx: Don't call non-existent Soft_emulate_8xx from SoftwareEmulation.

2007-09-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 18, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Scott Wood wrote: On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 10:08:50AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: On Sep 17, 2007, at 11:57 AM, Scott Wood wrote: On arch/ppc, Soft_emulate_8xx was used when full math emulation was turned off to emulate a minimal subset of floating point

Re: [PATCH 16/28] 8xx: Don't call non-existent Soft_emulate_8xx from SoftwareEmulation.

2007-09-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 18, 2007, at 10:23 AM, Scott Wood wrote: On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 10:19:05AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: Mainly that 8xx has been doing this for a vast number of years and I see no reason to stop doing it at this point. While I can see that it might be misleading, clearly 8xx linux users

[PATCH 16/28] 8xx: Don't call non-existent Soft_emulate_8xx from SoftwareEmulation.

2007-09-17 Thread Scott Wood
On arch/ppc, Soft_emulate_8xx was used when full math emulation was turned off to emulate a minimal subset of floating point load/store instructions, to avoid needing a soft-float toolchain. This function is called, but not present, on arch/powerpc, causing a build error if floating point