Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: ppc: Fix integer overflow in expression

2014-04-20 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 17 April 2014 15:23, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On 32-bit, "12 * NSEC_PER_SEC" doesn't fit in "unsigned long" > (NSEC_PER_SEC is a "long" constant), causing an integer overflow: > > drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c: In function 'corenet_cpufreq_cpu_init': > drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpu

[PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: ppc: Fix integer overflow in expression

2014-04-17 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On 32-bit, "12 * NSEC_PER_SEC" doesn't fit in "unsigned long" (NSEC_PER_SEC is a "long" constant), causing an integer overflow: drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c: In function 'corenet_cpufreq_cpu_init': drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c:211:9: warning: integer overflow in expression [-Wov